Miata Mailing List: August 1992, Message #24

sponsored by

[previous topic] [previous] [index] [next] [next topic]


From: (none) Subject: tire wear & replacement Date: (none)
(My response to Alan's (ctsx!ctsx!alan@uunet.uu.net) response to my post about tires (huh?) bounced with an "Outside mail not authorized" message, and I can't get an address for ctsx.celtech.com, so I'll put it on the mailing list). Alan, you wrote: > I don't see what having a slow leak has to do with the tire pressure you > run. If it leaks that means you have a puncture. Running less pressure > won't help any. If it leaks, get it fixed. I used to run about 28 PSI on > my old stock Bridgestones and it worked fine. I use the same with my new > AVSs. Lower pressure won't make that much (if any) difference in suspension > wear. It is a *very* slow leak. Generally it loses 5-10 psi over 3-5 days, enough to lower the average pressure, but sometimes will not lose any pressure at all for over a week. It's not necessarily a puncture; could be the valve, the valve stem seat, the bead-to-wheel seat, or (God forbid) the wheel itself. I have seen cast aluminum alloy wheels with virtually invisible pinhole leaks before, by the way. Because it's not usually a bother, I decided to put off 'fixing' it until new tires are on. Also, lower pressure in the tires *has to* be related to suspension wear. Try driving a car with short, stiff suspension (like the Miata) on a washboard road (especially dirt/rock/gravel) with nice, firm 'highway' tires. After gathering up your fillings, bandaging your kidneys and putting all of the parts back on the car, pressure down the tires to something like 15 psi and drive slowly back to the gas station that had the air pump. =8^) I had to do this once when driving an MG on a logging road in the Adirondacks. > Could just be that the right tire is the one that spins when both tires > loose traction (non-limited slip cars). This one has the LSD rear end. > The AVS Intermeditate ($87 or so at _The Tire Rack_, call 1-800 information > for the #) is a great tire, I have almost nothing bad to say about it. You > should run 4 of them, however. If you think it handles bad now I gaurentee > that the car will be *evil* with only 2 AVSs, no matter which end they are > put on. If you can't afford 4, you might consider the A-509 which is about > $20/tire cheaper. > > I'd say stick with the stock 185/60 size with the AVSs, it works just fine. Hmm, thanks for the advice, and the source info. NTW here in Austin wants around $110 for a 185/60 AVS. Do you really think that it would stick that much better than the Dunlop? You may be right -- the original Dunlops never were very impressive, particularly in the wet. > BTW: sound's like you didn't rotate the Dunlops that well. Try to rotate > (Front->Back) every 5-10000 miles or so. Yes, I'm guilty. I thought I'd be putting 'good' tires on a lot sooner than I have, and so neglected to rotate. _________________________________________________________________ James Miller -- developing Unix software at (!) IBM -- Austin _________________________________________________________________ Internet: jamesm@voyager.austin.ibm.com ibm?net: jamesm@lunch.austin.ibm.com VNET: JAMESM at AUSVMQ yaknet: 512 838-1608 UPSnet: 11400 Burnet Rd., IMAD 9541; Austin, Texas 78758 _________________________________________________________________

[previous topic] [previous] [index] [next] [next topic]