![]()
Miata Mailing List: November 1993, Message #58
sponsored by
From: buck@petra.ma30.bull.com (Kenneth J. Buck) Subject: Re: ins co's again Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1993 09:17:02 -0500
> From: Al Jenab> Subject: RE>Re: RE>Re: mx5 brakes and more power (fwd) > > [...] but it would be extremely difficult to prove that > the supercharger had caused the running over of a two-year-old in your > example, unless you were travelling at a speed unreachable in a dead-stock > car. [...] not informing them of a new set of performance tires on the > car [...] would be grounds for dropping you [...] > These are silly examples, but if the company did abandon you on any of > these grounds, you'd probably have a pretty good case for suing them > for breach of contract, not the other way around. i'd be very careful here. i'm sure most ins co's don't care much about your tires or whether you add a K&N air filter, etc. on the other hand, they don't have to *prove* that your turbocharger caused the accident, either - they just have to prove that you lied on the application form (assuming that they asked in the first place, etc.). also, IF the renewal questionaire says "answer these questions, and if you lie about something, consider yourself Not Covered, etc.", i'd be wary of assuming that it's okay to hold off installing your new supercharger until 10 minutes after putting the form in the mail. there MAY be some fine print that says "if the status of your car changes with respect to these items, you have to tell us." all i'm saying is, BE VERY CAREFUL about what you _assume_ about insurance applications and policies. read carefully and ask questions if in doubt. insurance companies are full of lawyers and have a lot more financial backing than you or i do if it comes to a court challenge. -- Ken Buck /| Internet: k.buck@ma30.bull.com \'o.O' ACK! Mail: Bull, MA30-833A =(___)= THPTPHH! 300 Concord Rd, Billerica, MA 01821 U