Miata Mailing List: February 1994, Message #1

sponsored by

                          [index] [next] [next topic]


From: Will Zehring Subject: "old" tires Date: Tue, 1 Feb 1994 08:04:47 -0500
Fellow fiends: First off, perhaps to put the England v. Japan argument to bed, BMW has just purchased 80% of Rover, so... soon enough you might not have any *new* British cars to kick around either. There were rumors of a new MG, but only BMW knows if it will be produced now. Saddly, almost the entire industry is gone from Britain now. So, don't be cruel. Anyway, on to my question (if I may...) I was minding my own business last night writting a check to the Miata Club of America when I read a recent copy of "Points to Ponder" inwhich they said that "old" tires (over 18 months old) have hardened and I shouldn't expect much out of them. Does that mean that the original tires (that were great on dry pavement, bad on wet, and down right lethal on snow/ice) that I put in the rafters 24 months ago are no good? What about the tires on the car (they've been there for 24 months too and seem just fine)? Are they saying that the tires age faster if they are *not* used? I ain't no tire expert, and I ain't no polymer chemist, and I ain't no rubber baron, but this *just doesn't make any sense to me*. I figure more than a few of us keep two sets of tires (autox/commuting) so does anyone have any comments on the age rate of unused or rarely used tires? Along that line, there has been a lot of talk about aftermarket (cheep) wheels. If anyone has a set that they would like to unload, please contact me as I would like to buy four. Look at it this way: sell them to me and in a year I'll tell you if my tires are no good. Many thanks, Will Zehring (aka wzehrin@cms.cc.wayne.edu)

                          [index] [next] [next topic]