![]()
Miata Mailing List: June 1994, Message #46
sponsored by
From: Al StaatsSubject: Re: K&N Date: Sat, 4 Jun 1994 03:23:55 -0400
On Fri, 3 Jun 1994, Jeff Maurer wrote: I've been using K&N filters in most of my cars since 1986. I chose them 1) because they're freer-breathing, and 2) they cost less than OEM filters over the life of the car. Can't say I notice the advertised 1-3hp gain with the filter, but there's a bit more intake noise and a bit better throttle response. Some info on the net has suggested that K&N gauze filters are a bit less effective at filtering than some foam filters. As I recall the testing was done by a motorcycling magazine. My experience and the feedback we have received from many of our customers, especially those of us with motorcycling backgrounds suggest just the opposite-- foam filters are less restrictive because they are more porous. They are also popular because they are easier to clean- instead of solvent, they clean with soap and water. If you talk with bikers or auto ralliers, they use foam filters with foam wrappers, which in competition, they tear off and discard. For general performance purposes, short of competition, I would vote for the added filtering quality of a cloth filter, such as the K&N. Properly oiled, their filtering characteristics outperfom foam while offering almost the same level of performance.