![]()
Miata Mailing List: June 1994, Message #68
sponsored by
From: hazmat@motor.arl.army.mil Subject: Re: K&N Date: Mon, 6 Jun 1994 14:35:19 -0400
I posted this before, back in February, and given the recent talk about K&N filters, I thought reposting it would be appropriate. >Here's something I thought would be of interest, considering the >talk there has been going on about the K&N air filter. It may >not be the wonder-filter everyone says. I got Ed's permission to >post this here. I got it off of the BMW motorcycle mailing list. > >Matt >hazmat@motor.arl.army.mil ----------------------------- Note follows ----------------------------- From: Ed Hackett X-Original-Sender: edh@maxey.unr.edu Date: 25 Feb 94 00:12:40 CST (Fri) Here's the info I have on air filter performance. Tests were done using SAE J726C Test Method 5-best --> 1-worst Oiled foam Paper Oil Bath Oiled Gauze (AMSOIL, UNI) (K&N) Large particle efficiency 5 5 5 4 Small particle efficiency 5 4 1 2 Airflow capacity 5 2 3 5 Dust holding capacity 4 2 5 2 Load up characteristic 4 1 5 1 Backfire characteristic 3 2 5 3 Cleanability 4 1 4 3 As you can see, K&Ns are great for airflow, which is what they were designed for. Their original application was on racing engines, where airflow is important and ultimate engine life was of little consern. They are not as good at filtering as paper or oiled foam types. Ed Hackett edh@maxey.unr.edu The Desert Research Institute DoD #0200 WMTC BMWRA DIOC Reno, Nevada (702) 673-7380 KotLS KotLE DotD #0003 I'm not really a chemist, I'm just one of 900SS K100RS 501 CAMEL them motorsickle sonsabitches. __=o&o>__ ----------------------------------------------------------- Matt Bennett Army Research Lab hazmat@motor.arl.army.mil Microwave Sensors, AMSRL-SS-SG 2800 Powder Mill Road Adelphi, MD 20783 301-394-2530 301-394-4690 (FAX) -----------------------------------------------------------