![]()
Miata Mailing List: December 1995, Message #14
sponsored by
From: Brian PorterSubject: Re: Door speaker comparison test Date: Fri, 1 Dec 1995 09:53:37 -0500
On Thu, 30 Nov 1995, Jyri J. Virkki wrote: > Once upon a time Bret A. Schuhmacher said: > > > > > As I'd agree with removing the headrest speakers in typical > > > applications(I'm amazed Mazda even did such a stupid thing), the > > > subwoofer is quite nec. though. > > > > I was planning on buying some headrest speakers. Why are they such a bad > > idea? > > Well, IMHO (and its important to remember that as far as stereo stuff > is concerned, what is good is simply what sounds good to the owner, > there is no such thing as "best" - a good example: the MB Quart > separate component speakers are unquestionably excellent > top-of-the-line speakers that very frequently win in car audio > competitions, yet, their sounds is very peculiar and people tend to > either love them or hate them. I personally absolutely hate the way > they sound). I don't recall "best" being there.. You don't like hard-domes do you? Many more people love them than hate them and the tweets are FLAT to 20k unlike soft-domes.. You can attenuate them tweets. I'm amazed how someone can "absolutely hate" the Quarts.. What do you prefer? ADS? > > Anyway... IMHO, the headrest speakers are nice for filling in sound at > highway speeds with the stock radio. But once you add more power, > better speakers, etc, they are not only unecessary, but they can also > ruin the soudstage (again depending on preferences...). When I > upgraded my audio system I disconnected my HR speakers, I didn't want > them interfering with the sound (if anyone wants them I have them in a > box somewhere, just make an offer!). > I guess... I think preferences would change if someone simply HEARD how good car audio systems can be.. Its a problem of not ever hearing a nice system.. Once bitten by the bug, it will never leave you. -Brian > -- > Jyri J. Virkki - 201-829-4213 - Linux: Choice of a GNU Generation > > >