Miata Mailing List: September 1999, Message #405
sponsored by
| From: | Bill Rockoff <BillR@isescorp.com> |
| Subject: | RE: Car and Driver S2000, comparison |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:13:10 -0400 |
My biased opinion to follow, but first an anecdote....
My dad leased a '91 Legend at Greenwich Acura (or whatever it's called)
which is right across US1 from Miller Motorcars, which used to be Chinetti
Ferrari. There was an NSX on the lot, and a couple of guys were looking at
it and comparing it to the Ferraris available across the street. One of 'em
said "Ferrari has decades of racing history. This is just a Honda." The
other guy said, "Well, Ferrari may have the older racing history, but Honda
has the FASTER racing history."
If C/D liked the Honda better than the Porsche, who am I to argue? (SLK and
Mroadster, neat as they are, are still sedan-based and maybe shouldn't be
held to the same standards as far as "feel" goes.)
>>There are number reasons that I am not sold on the car.
When it comes time to buy your Miata a bigger sibling, "which do you like
best" is the only thing that matters when you put your money down.
>>1. Electronic Dash? In a retro convertible?
Hey, if it weighs less and works better, why not? It's good enough for
Schumacher.
>>2. Power top in a smallish convertible. The car already weighed in under
2800lbs, they could have saved some weight.
I gotta agree there. No power windows, either, please.
>>3. VTEC reliability. can you spin 8900rpm racing all day, and then drive
home without worries?
You can if it's a Honda. Don't forget, this company made its early money
building motorcycles. 8,900 rpm is "midrange" on a motorcycle these days.
>>4. Can the car come in for $32K?
If Honda can build a TL sedan with everything including GPS for $32k, surely
they can build a roadster for that.
It might not be for me, but I'd sure like to see one.
- Bill